🔗 Share this article

Only two days prior to the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – not just who would win overall, and precinct by precinct. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and has become something of a local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise forecast map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win while missing the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. He possesses a talent for witty coinages. He pointed out, for instance, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from Park Slope to another area to Astoria, where he predicted (accurately) that Mamdani would triumph by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in readership and most voters leaned toward the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

What was your night?

I had to do that since they were dropping around 200,000 votes into the tally every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: The candidate led the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but there were large groups of ballots that came in after that and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world in which yesterday turned out kind of poorly for him, where the opponent was going to end up basically increasing his support from the earlier contest. But the winner added half a million votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

How did Mamdani get additional support from?

He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He gained considerably with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: diverse, youthful, renters and people squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in immigrant strongholds that went for Trump last year went for Zohran now. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Effects

A major development of the night was the record turnout. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Participation was significantly higher than I had expected. I thought we might exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3M – that is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s favored to surpass half. He has 50.4% but remain around 200K ballots left to report at that time. So it’s not certain, but I think it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it because then none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win any district in any borough. Including Tottenville in Staten Island, similar to an highly conservative area. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo kept very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these Republicans on Staten Island who had a high participation. I think occurred a lot of strategic balloting by GOP voters. This happened prior to the former president tweeted his support for the candidate, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – was support for the candidate dominant in those areas of the boroughs?

In my view there was some weakening of the commie corridor in certain places like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. There, for example, the Greek landlords and residents supported Cuomo. Thus there was a little resistance. But overall, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani won – he scored between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the election there was coverage on whether Mamdani was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

Exist neighborhoods with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. However in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Similarly in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned the independent. Plus, you have Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, they were strongly Cuomo. Therefore I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but he did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what New York represents in politics? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest figures from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see additional examples – people will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that each urban center in America can have similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of progressive influence in America – because they’re young, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.